Roth IRA, to convert or not to convert?

The answer depends on your tax rate now and expected tax rate when you plan to take withdrawals. Also, you should consider this only if you can cover the taxes with funds from outside of your IRAs, otherwise you are forfeiting the tax deferral on those funds.

For example, someone with a low tax rate now, from large losses, large deductions or low income, may have less in taxes to pay now so that the rate of tax is less than what it could be in the future, making converting a wise financial move.

As a separate matter, the taxes can be paid over two years, however, if you expect a higher rate for 2011, the interest you earn will not make it worth waiting.

Someone with high taxes now, or in the AMT, would be a bad candidate for converting.

If you are considering this and want more analysis, we created a tool for that purpose so let us know.

Planning for Tax Law Changes – the Investment Piece

Among the anticipated changes in taxes for individuals are the increase of the long-term capital gains rate from 15% to at least 20% and the elimination of the qualified dividend rate of 15%. How do you respond? That depends on several factors.

If the investments are tax-sheltered, as in an IRA or 401(k) plan, then the change has no impact: current growth is sheltered and withdrawals are always taxed as ordinary income. If the investments are in a taxable account, then the analysis involves your long-term plans and investment style. On the long-term capital gains, if you may be selling investments soon, doing so now and buying back (subject to the wash sale rules, if applicable), would increase your basis so that less would be taxed later at a higher rate. However, if you plan to hold investments long-term, there is little reason to react now. That is, the increased tax far in the future is less, on a net present value basis, than paying a lower tax today.

The long-term capital gains tax is still likely to be less than the maximum marginal rate, so converting what would be earned income into capital gains remains attractive (e.g., the basis for exercising and holding Incentive Stock Options)

As for the dividends tax, again this depends on your investment strategy. If you believe that the proper stocks or funds include those that distribute dividends, then the tax cost is part of your analysis in selecting those investments over funds or stocks that do not pay dividends.

As with any decision regarding the tax impact on investments, it is the investment strategy that should rule the outcome.

We will report more on possible tax changes and related strategies in upcoming newsletter posts.

Let us know if you have questions or comments. Thanks,

Steven

Estate planning – your homework before and after

Before – what you have to do to get the proper documents executed

Estate planning and the analysis of life insurance connect in the following way, so you want to do the analysis with your financial advisor in order to make sure that the survivors have sufficient resources to maintain the same lifestyle during their life expectancy. The reason that the analysis of life insurance should be done before deciding on what documents you need for your estate plan is that you may choose to increase your death benefit, which could change the size of your potential estate, thereby changing the estate tax planning. That is, if the investable assets are not sufficient, even after making liquid certain kinds of personal property (e.g., a second home), then there is a need for additional life insurance.

In most cases, the type of insurance to be acquired is term insurance. This is merely a death benefit used to fund the shortfall between assets required to maintain the lifestyle of the survivors and actual assets available. Whole life or other types of insurance should only be used when permanent insurance is required, as in the case of maintaining estate liquidity throughout your lifetime.

After you determine the assets required to support the lifestyle of the survivor, you determine to whom the assets flow. For example, you could leave everything directly to the survivor, you could separate some portion of the assets by gift now or at death to go directly to children or you could have a trust control the division of assets as needed over time. Separating assets by gift now would be important if you wanted to ensure some minimum funding for children, such as guaranteeing coverage for their college expenses.

Selection of fiduciaries is next: In determining the final estate plan, many choices revolve around the fiduciary that you select for a particular role. For example, people who typically would have chosen to have all assets flow to the surviving spouse become willing to use trusts when they realize that the person whom they expect to select as trustee will make decisions that they would have made had they survived. The fiduciaries that must be put in place include the following:

a) Executor: This is the person who “marshals” all assets of the estate together, pays death expenses and transfers ownership of property to the surviving spouse or trust. This is approximately a nine month task.

b) Guardian: This is the person whom you select to love and care for your children in your absence. The spouse selects the surviving spouse and then a second or third choice beyond that. This job lasts until each child has reached majority (age eighteen in Massachusetts).

c) Trustee: This person has potentially the longest term job because he or she must manage the trust assets and make distributions of income and sometimes principal to the surviving spouse, children and even grandchildren. Depending on the terms of the trust, this job could last until the children are young adults.

The trustee acts as the owner of assets and manages the investments, taxes and distributions. The trustee can delegate this work, and review what people he or she hires complete for the trust and beneficiaries.

d) Medical representatives and attorneys in fact: you will also want to select people to make medical decisions and manage your finances is you are not able.

After – what you have to do after you have the proper documents executed

Make sure that you update all of your beneficiary designations:

Qualified Plans (IRA’s, 401k plans, etc.): Primary Beneficiary – to the surviving spouse (so he or she can roll over the proceeds to an IRA and thereby defer income taxes); and Secondary Beneficiary – to your children (or your own revocable, depending on whether you want the assets controlled or available to children).

Life Insurance and Annuities: Primary Beneficiary – when not owned by an irrevocable trust, such as group term, to your own revocable trust (for estate tax benefits, e.g., using credit at first death); and Secondary Beneficiary – to the surviving spouse (in case of trust has been terminated for some reason).

Other Assets: Consider changing ownership of any jointly held assets to ownership by one of you. Any assets held as joint tenants with rights of survivorship will go to the survivor by operation of law and never get to your revocable trust. (You want to be sure that you have sufficient assets going to the trust to realize the full tax reduction effect.)

You should also consider compiling a reference book or adding to your financial plan book photocopies of important papers, identifying where the originals are, then adding a list of important contacts, instructions to your executor and trustee and other important notes for family and friends. You would update this at least annually with new asset statements (consider this as you gather information for preparing your taxes). To be more specific, the list (and copies) should include:

* 1. Location of original will, trust, etc.
* 2. Location of health care proxy and durable power of attorney
* 3. List of professionals with contact information: doctor, attorney, CPA, etc.
* 4. List of fiduciaries with contact information: health care proxy, guardians, executors and trustees, attorney-in-fact for durable power of attorney, etc.
* 5. Location of insurance policies and valuables such as original titles, etc.
* 6. Location of safe deposit box for valuables and items in #5 or 7
* 7. List of all bank and investment accounts and location of any stock certificates or other documentation for investments
* 8. List of all mortgages, loans and credit card accounts
* 9. Any appraisals or other listing of items by value
* 10. All automatic debits that need to be addressed (stopped, changed)
* 11. List of all password protected accounts (e-mail, on line banking and credit cards, etc.) and where to locate the passwords… and the password to access the passwords!

Let us know if you have questions or comments. Thanks,

Steven

Shaken Investor Confidence – restoring faith in investment managers

The article below on client satisfaction intrigues me. (And you can comment below or ask us for input Did you get the best investment advice before the crash?)

Typically, my clients are very candid about their views regarding investment selection. However, the article suggests that many investors may just be waiting to get back to even before switching…

What really makes me wonder is: (1) what more could advisors and investment managers have done to prove that there was no more that they could have known in time to act any differently, and (2) how do we rebuild confidence when so many people were rattled so much financially and emotionally?

Simply repeating the platitudes that investment allocation works over time is not enough to cure the shaken confidence.

What are your insights? What ideas do you have on the issue? Let me know.

Thanks,

Steven

02-19-10 | 12:51pm
Client Satisfaction

Since the beginning of the market downturn in August 2008 through June 2009, investor satisfaction with their advisors has fallen from 67% of households being satisfied to 55% of households, according to a Cerulli survey. In addition, investors’ trust in financial firms is at abysmal levels, with only 26% of households believing that financial firms are looking out for their best interests.

Based on these numbers, many industry experts predicted a deluge of client movement as clients left their advisors to find better service and performance. Cerulli, however, has detected only a slight uptick in the number of investors switching financial providers. In fact, most of the movement of clients between firms has been tied to advisors moving between firms and taking their book of business along.

In Cerulli’s view, this data should not necessarily re-assure advisors that their client relationships are safe. While most investors have not left their current advisors, many have been waiting until market conditions settle before making a move. In addition, investors indicated that they are less likely to turn to their existing advisor for a new financial product or service. In August 2008, 70% of investors surveyed indicated that they would seek new products and services from their primary advisor, but by June 2009, that number had fallen to 59% of investors.

Finally, among high-net-worth clients, Cerulli has found a notable trend of investors maintaining more advisory relationships than in the past. It appears that high-net-worth investors have generalized the idea of diversification beyond investments to apply to their advisory relationships. In light of the failure of some well-respected firms during the financial crisis, high-net-worth investors are less willing to rely on a single advisor or a single firm. This indicates that going forward advisors serving high-net-worth clients will maintain a lower share-of-wallet of their clients’ assets and may have a reduced role in influencing their client’s financial decisions.

While inertia will likely keep most investors in their current advisory relationships, advisors would be wise to assess their clients’ level of satisfaction as well as the role the advisor plays in clients’ financial decision-making. Advisors should work to re-assert their value proposition with their clients to show their clients the relationship is worth the cost.

Likelihood to Seek New Products or Services from Primary Advisor by Channel (graph not shown)

Source: Cerulli Associates, Phoenix Marketing International

Here is a related article:

What Are You Scared Of?

I’ve been thinking a lot about fear and the impact it has on our industry–specifically, the communication strategies we use as financial advisors; the nature of our advice and the ability to do our job; and investors and the public in general.

Maybe it’s just me, but it seems our industry is scared of having strong opinions. I understand that making public statements about market forecasts, performance predictions, and guarantees of any sort would be a legitimate cause for concern. But if you put all of those legitimate concerns in a bucket, it seems to me that it’s a rather small bucket. So why are we scared of strong opinions?

Is it possible that this small set of legitimate fears is having a greater impact than it should on the rest of our business? We seem to no longer know what we can have strong opinions about. For example, at what point is it OK for us to respond to criticism or to defend ourselves publicly? There have certainly been a lot of negative things written about us, so at what point is it OK for us to share all the positive things we’ve been doing? Certainly, it’s OK to share our opinions about how we charge for advice and wisdom, how we make decisions, and how we communicate with clients.

This fear isn’t isolated to how we run our businesses. Fear has always played a major role in how we make decisions about money, but the in the last two years, it seems to have become part of our national conversation. I can’t remember a time where there was more fear of the future, fear of the unknown, and fear of the “economy”–whatever that is–and all these issues are out of our control. So what can we do to help clients deal with them?

One of our primary goals (and one of the reasons why I think long-term relationships are so important in financial planning) is to give clients an opportunity to download their fears. But in helping them understand the difference between rational and irrational fear, how do we avoid the same problem ourselves?